Playoffs round 1 are as follows:
#1 Manuel vs #8 Steve
#2 Seth vs #7 Joe
#3 David vs #6 Jon
#4 Rich vs #5 Landen
Beer League Tennis
Carrollton, Texas
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
WEEK 7 MATCHUPS
WEEK 7: David Stair vs Steve McNeill Joe Terry vs Jon Hanson Landon Schale vs Manuel Diaz Rich Beller vs Seth Summerlin
Friday, March 25, 2011
Who's Playin' This Weekend?
Well,....who is on the courts this weekend? Anybody?....If anyone plays on Sunday, let me know as I will show up and take some pics.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Jon vs Seth
Got my ass absolutely kicked last night by Seth. Damn it! I just can't quite figure out the whole serve and volley thing. He just sits back and runs me all over with that flat back spin. Oh tennis lords - what is the answer!
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Joe vs Moe
Here are some shots of Joe the Pro green beer drinker vs Madrid Moe
Joe is trying to remember just how many green beers he drank last night
Moe had to receive special medical attention before the match even began
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Beer League Points - survey
Need some feedback on how I track points. Without going into the formula suffice it to say the current point system basically averages performance (match wins, set wins, game wins) of all matches played regardless if its one match or ten. Therefore a player with only a few matches played but all wins will likely rank higher than a player with many matches played and a few match losses.
I have devised a new point system that awards points per match and then accumulates those points for each match played. It still awards partial points even if you lose a match by assigning partial points for game wins. The benefit of this would be that players who don't finish all their matches will not have as much an advantage if they have mostly wins. Therefore a player with less wins but more matches played might end up with a higher rank due to the points earned in the extra matches played.
We could just go to the 3 points sytem like Oak Creek but that just seems like no fun to me. What do you all think?
I have devised a new point system that awards points per match and then accumulates those points for each match played. It still awards partial points even if you lose a match by assigning partial points for game wins. The benefit of this would be that players who don't finish all their matches will not have as much an advantage if they have mostly wins. Therefore a player with less wins but more matches played might end up with a higher rank due to the points earned in the extra matches played.
We could just go to the 3 points sytem like Oak Creek but that just seems like no fun to me. What do you all think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)